I wrote a little essay for Time.com on the iPad launch (and the reactions to it.) Here's the opening riff:
If you time-traveled back to 1995, and asked the leading futurists of that time where our machines were soon to take us, you might well have heard just as much rhapsodizing about document-centric interfaces as that about hypertext and the World Wide Web. The first generation of software interfaces forced the user to think too much about the tools, the story went, and too little about the task. If you wanted to write a memo, you had to think, "First I must launch Microsoft Word, my tool, and then create a new document." If you wanted to embed some piece of information that Microsoft Word wasn't optimized for, you had to launch another application, create and modify a new element there, and then move back to your original application environment, where you could deposit the alien data object. A number of proposed interfaces — most famously, Apple's failed OpenDoc initiative, shut down shortly after the company acquired NeXT — promised to reverse the priorities: our desktops would prioritize the tasks over the tools, the documents over the applications. The user wouldn't launch documents inside an application. They'd just create a document on its own, which would lie there like a surgical patient, and if you needed a specific tool — a little word-processing here, or some video-editing there — you just grabbed that tool and started working on the patient in front of you. In the application-centric model, you were constantly lugging organs into other operating rooms and then dragging them back.
The weird thing about the iPad is that it has landed us 180 degrees from where we thought we were heading. The iPad interface — like the iPhone's — tries to do everything in its power to do away with documents and files. There is no Finder or root-level file navigation. It's apps, apps, apps, as far as the eye can see. According to the demo last week, the main way to launch iWork documents is by an internal document-selection process after launch, where your files are presented to you in a gallery format.
I truly don't know how I feel about this. It might be genius. Maybe most users are more confused by Finders and File Explorers than I've realized. But I can't help thinking that if the iPad really wants to be a device that you might take on a business trip instead of the laptop, it's going to need a little more document-centrism. By a wide margin, the most disappointing element of the user interface, or UI, is the home screen, which is virtually unchanged from the original iPhone UI. (The iPad is far, far more than a blown-up iPod Touch, but you can't tell from the home screen.) Surely there's a better way to exploit multitouch and that extra screen real estate for navigating all the information that will be stored on these machines. I have no inside information on this, but given the inventiveness of the iWork user experience, I can't help thinking that an iPad-native home environment was a project that didn't make the ship dates, and that they slapped on the old iPhone screen for continuity at the last minute. But time will tell.
Steven, for me Dr.Snow and Whitehead are heros, as all others on our Planet that care about life,
for me, Steven, you are too, hero, it is important to tell us about the epidemics, and also about:
GUN UNDER PILLOW, SOMEDAY IT’S GOING TO GO OFF
If the trends of asymmetric warfare continue, and the suicide bombers start detonating suitcase nukes – at that point, all bets are off.
The one thing we can do now to prevent such a dark future is to reduce, if not eliminate, the current stockpiles of nuclear weapons in the World.
The United States alone has around 10,000 weapons in its active arsenal.
This is madness in an age of asymmetric warfare, where mutually assured destruction is meaningless.
If only we could eliminate, the current stockpiles of nuclear weapons in the World. Just live without any weapons, just live without terrorizing each other (my note).
It would be an epic undertaking, yet history shows we are capable of projects on this scale, if we apply ourselves. We eliminated smallpox from the wild, after all.
If we can rid the World of a microscopic virus, we can eliminate weapons the size of tractor-trailers..
We hear a lot of war-on-terror rhetoric cajoling us to be realistic about the threats that face us, to confront those threats without pity or foolish idealism.
That’s why we have elective wars and unauthorized wiretapping: because we’re realists now, or so we’re told.
But wherever each of us stands on the wars and the wiretaps, we need to agree that maintaining a stockpile of 10,000 nuclear weapons is the very opposite of realism. It is, in fact, an idealism of the most starry-eyed sort: the ideal that says we’re better off spending billions of dollars maintaining devices that would, were they all detonated, potentially end life as we know it on planet Earth.
We are, as a species, sleeping with a gun under our pillow. It may make us feel safe to know that we have all that firepower so close at hand, but someday it’s going to go off. Steven Johnson and me
sorry I put some my note, but I am happy that some people think like me, I'll read this in my writing class,
old Russian woman - very much idealist
Posted by: Elena | February 14, 2010 at 12:20 PM
(That's an odd comment above me - spam?)
Several apps access the camera roll as documents, by the way. I'm not sure you've witnessed enough people getting confused by the Finder or Explorer - it's totally confusing if you don't get the central mental model of it. I have had people say, "I saved it in Excel," for example. When I asked what they meant, they said, "In the application." It turned out they had no idea where they saved it, just that it appeared in the list of recently saved documents in Excel's menus.
Posted by: Andy Polaine | February 15, 2010 at 01:50 PM
Hi, thank you very much. good job.
Magazin haberleri
Posted by: Magazin | February 17, 2010 at 06:04 AM
Thanks for a great site Payas..
Posted by: bayrak | March 02, 2010 at 04:37 AM
Congratulations !
Very very nice site
Thank you.. =)
Posted by: bayrak | March 04, 2010 at 07:12 AM
Thanks for such a good post....
https://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?action=batch_download&send_id=817789614&email=7cff47bb7cdcb76fbfa15e66c81a1961
Posted by: Multitasking apple | March 11, 2010 at 10:14 PM
Hi, thank you very much. good job.
Posted by: Magazin | March 12, 2010 at 02:36 PM
Thank you for the hint at and interesting distinction between tool- and task-focused interfaces. It the reason I think the iPad will be a failure: the people who can or might want to afford it don't need it. Buisnessmen can't do business and students can't study with it. You can get a lot of books for 500$. But one day Apple or someone else might come up with a solution to the problem: A tool with which you can work on any task. And then they solve the compatibility issues. And then we really are in trouble.
The App-structure just screams "TRUSTED COMPUTING" all over the place, only it is not the state intervening by penal law, but private corporatitions manipulating what we see, say and do, subtly hidden behind innumerable layers of contracts.
On the other side is Google with its maximum-compatibility philosophy. They don't need the control over all tools if the few they are selling sell well. But their interest in our privacy and self-determination ends pricesely at the point where it stands in the way of profit.
Posted by: pmn | March 16, 2010 at 07:55 PM
interesting! its great, I love this article very much including me and my friends very much because i got my desired information in your posting. keep it up and continue your work
Posted by: management dissertation | March 25, 2010 at 10:40 PM
http://oppao.net/n-ona/
http://oppao.net/navi/
http://oppao.net/new-d2/
http://oppao.net/fd3/
http://oppao.net/soap2/
http://oppao.net/bg2/
http://oppao.net/host2/
http://oppao.net/lesson2/
http://oppao.net/op2/
http://oppao.net/fl3/
http://oppao.net/bb2/
http://oppao.net/s-este/
http://oppao.net/rd2/
http://oppao.net/kawa/
http://oppao.net/n-club2/
http://s-auc.net/
Posted by: オテモヤン | March 28, 2010 at 02:22 PM
This is exactly the type of info. I have been searching for. Thank you for taking the time to write such an informative post.
Posted by: Wholesale Sunglasses | March 29, 2010 at 09:29 PM
A great article, Steven! I wrote a quick post about the multitasking issue (http://blog.intuitymedialab.eu/2010/02/11/multitasking-is-evil-leaving-the-desktop-metaphore-behind/). You also might be interested in the great article "The iPad screen is not your desktop screen" (http://craigmod.com/satellite/ipad_screen/) by Craig Mod which is also related to your thoughts. Keep up the good work!
Posted by: Matthias Wagler | April 01, 2010 at 07:33 AM
Came across your blog and that sounds great stuff....
https://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?action=batch_download&send_id=817789614&email=7cff47bb7cdcb76fbfa15e66c81a1961
Posted by: Multitasking bug | April 05, 2010 at 01:40 AM
The center of diversity of the genus Malus is in eastern Turkey. The apple tree was perhaps the earliest tree to be cultivated, and its fruits have been improved through selection over thousands of years.
Posted by: Generic Viagra | April 14, 2010 at 12:52 PM
My research indicates that adding lemon juice helps to stop the
process of browning (polyphen oloxidase). It is also recommended that
you should heat the juice to at least 160F.
Posted by: buy generic viagra | April 19, 2010 at 01:59 PM
I think this blog is pretty cool,it has a lot of good and interesting content aboutDoes Apple Think Multitasking Is A Bug Not A Feature? And Other Questions....,good for you I hope you can add more useful information and upgrade your site,I really like it
Posted by: lots in costa rica | July 20, 2010 at 08:26 AM
All we can do now to prevent this dark future is to reduce if not eliminate, existing stocks of nuclear weapons in the world.
Posted by: Used tractors values | July 26, 2010 at 09:30 AM
All we can do now to prevent this dark future is to reduce if not eliminate, existing stocks of nuclear weapons in the world.
Posted by: Cartus epson | August 04, 2010 at 02:59 AM
If time traveled back to 1995, and asked the most important futurists of that era where our machines were ready to take, which could well have heard so much rhapsody on document-centric interfaces such as that about hypertext and the World Wide Web.
Posted by: Fiberglass pool prices | August 09, 2010 at 04:49 AM
Not only is there a cromulent looking bistro with frisee and lardons etc etc, but sushi that looks like it might not kill you.
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
Posted by: viagra online | August 19, 2010 at 09:22 AM
wow i love t hat SO much... can i cut and paste it into my blog?? but give u credit, of course???
Posted by: Retro Jordans | August 25, 2010 at 06:26 PM