Dawn of the digital natives - is reading declining? | Technology | The Guardian
A number of people wrote in late last year to ask what I thought of the NEA report on declining literacy, To Read Or Not To Read, in the light of my arguments in Everything Bad Is Good For You. I actually jotted down some pretty extensive notes about it, either for a blog post or an op-ed, but it was right before Christmas, and so they ended up sitting on my hard drive. But the other day, the Guardian asked me if I had anything to say about the issue, so I went back and wrote up this little essay that's running today in the Guardian. Here's a quick taste of it:
The NEA makes a convincing case that both kids and adults are reading fewer books. "Non-required" reading - ie, picking up a book for the fun of it - is down 7% since 1992 for all adults, and 12% for 18-24 year olds.
The subtitle of the NEA report - A Question Of National Consequence - would lead you believe this dramatic drop must have had done significant damage to our reading proficiencies as a society. And indeed, NEA chair Dana Giola states boldly in his introduction: "The story the data tell is simple, consistent and alarming." But then the data turns out to be complex, inconsistent and not really that alarming at all. As Giola puts it, in the very next sentence: "Although there has been measurable progress in recent years in reading ability at the elementary school level, all progress appears to halt as children enter their teenage years."
What was that again? There's measurable progress in two of the three age groups reviewed? Actually, it's more than just measurable: if you look at the charts, the single biggest change - either positive or negative - is the spike upwards in reading abilities among nine-year-olds, which jumped seven points from 1999.
But at least there must be an "alarming" drop in reading skills among those 17-year-olds to justify this big report. And there it is: the teenagers are down five points from 1988. But wait, this is all on a scale of 0-500. If you scored it on a standard 100-point exam scale, it's the equivalent of dropping a single point. Not exactly cause for national alarm.
I came from NY today, arriving in S.Paulo this morning. I had the honor of travelling with Steven. Hope you all have the opportunity to see him at Canal Livre (I will !)
Posted by: Ricardo de Castro Barbosa | February 13, 2008 at 05:12 PM
Steven! Just came from Campus Party, @ São Paulo... Loved your lecture! Just wanted to say that Interface Culture saved my graduate work @ college! THANK YOU! Hope you like Brasil ;)
Posted by: Mari | February 14, 2008 at 06:21 PM
Giải pháp văn phòng chia sẻ (Virtual Office), công nghệ tiên tiến, thích hợp cho: thành lập công ty, chi nhánh, VPĐD, giúp giảm chi phí tối đa cho doanh nghiệp, tại cao ốc 19 tầng Indochina Park Tower, 4 Nguyễn Đình Chiểu, Quận 1 (có sẵn line điện thoại, Fax, vào hoạt động ngay).Giá thuê văn phòng chỉ từ 50 USD/1 công ty/tháng.
Posted by: GIẢI PHÁP VĂN PHÒNG CHO NGƯỜI KHỞI NGHIỆP - Q.1-HCM | February 16, 2008 at 02:42 AM
Thần Tài Nhà Đất, chuyên thông tin mua bán nhà đất, bất động sản, đất nền dự án, căn hộ cao cấp, Mua ban nha dat, bat dong san, dat nen du an, du an quy hoach, dự án quy hoạch khu vực Nhơn Trạch
Posted by: Mua bán nhà đất Nhơn Trạch | Dat nen du an Nhon Trach | February 16, 2008 at 02:43 AM
Maybe long form reading is in decline due mostly to the weakness of reading things on the computer. This is one reason I'm excited about reflected light displays like eInk (used in the Kindle). I think if we can have a better way to read things digitally the long form will become more popular.
Posted by: chris sivori | February 23, 2008 at 08:40 AM
Your argument is based on quantity, but ignores quality. Clearly, not all reading is equally valuable, and my concern is more that today's youth may not be reading sufficiently stimulating things. A diet of friends' blogs and entertainment websites simply creates a feedback loop.
Posted by: yellowhandman | February 26, 2008 at 03:59 AM
Fuck You in hell.
Posted by: Comments (6) | February 26, 2008 at 04:58 AM
Heh, seems like we were thinking the same thing.
I just read this post (03mar08), but have been thinking about this topic for a while and summed it up in a recent post:
http://cognections.typepad.com/lifeblog/2008/02/were-moving-int.html
Posted by: charlie | March 02, 2008 at 11:48 PM
http://www.girlnackt.com/
Posted by: nachbarin | April 04, 2008 at 02:32 AM
Steven: How could you misspell Dana Gioia's name several times in your column when you linked to the press release which spelled it properly?
It's unfortunate that we choose to apply severely critical judgment to a writer's thoughts when s/he cannot be bothered to spell properly, but that is what we do.
Gioia or Giola, the choice is your's Mr. Johnson.
Posted by: Davis Teippe | April 08, 2008 at 09:10 PM