
A few weeks ago I went out to L.A. to tape a roundtable discussion on the future for Time Magazine's annual "What's Next?" issue. It's on the stands now, and it features a full-height picture of me looking gravely concerned about something (presumably the future.) It's a fun conversation, covering lots of different issues. I ride a few hobby-horses that most of you are already familiar with, but there are also a couple of riffs that are new ones. There's an edited version (without photos) here, and an unedited audio podcast here.
Downloaded the podcast and listened to it today while running. Now please post the antidote for removing that one woman's awful, insinuating voice from my skull. "I mean, whaaaaat is goooooing onnnnnn?"
In a less mean-spirited vein, I often wonder whether these sorts of roundtables, which often strive for political balance, wouldn't be more probing or engaging if the participants represented a narrower range of opinions. In that sense, I think that whatever conversations happen in the spaces of the so-called "magic middle" may actually signify the death knell of roundtables like this one. And I'm not entirely sure whether that's a step away from a greater pluralism; maybe it's just a rejection of the ersatz pluralism that we see everyday on tv and in magazines.
Posted by: Rob | March 16, 2006 at 08:08 PM
So is it suposed to be like the Real World? All of you have the different personalities and you come to discuss what's going on with society? By the way, I think the picture is great-especially the woman with her posture in check. She kind of looks like she's posing for an O Magazine pictorial.
Posted by: Suburbia in the City | March 17, 2006 at 12:36 PM
Posing for an O magazine pictorial?
More like a 'Desperate Housewives' promo.
A great discussion nonetheless.
Posted by: Jeremy Ballenger | March 22, 2006 at 04:17 AM
Hello ! This is very [url=http://www.google.com/bb497]good[/url] site !!
Posted by: Diesel | April 03, 2006 at 06:52 AM