Any budding entrepreneurs out there waiting to create the next toy empire? I have the plan for you.
As some of you know, I am the father of two little boys: a two-and-a-half-year-old, and a ten-month-old. Over the past few months, we've been plagued by the younger boy, Rowan, going through the exact same phase that his older brother did at a comparable point: he is obsessed with grownup objects that look vaguely like they might be some kind of toy but emphatically are not. Cell phones, landline phones, remote controls, electric fans, PDAs humidifiers, lamps, anything at all with an electric cord attached to it. The more dangerous, the better. If we had a suitcase nuke hanging around in our living room, I'm sure he'd be in to that as well.
Now, if you've ever spent any time in a modern toy store, you know that the shelves are amply stocked with kiddie versions of most of these things: baby's first cell phone, little plastic lanterns, oversized remote control-like gadgets, day-glo keyboards. We have purchased most of these items, and they sit around our parlor floor and the boys' room like dejected orphans. Rowan has no interest in them whatsoever. I know that this is all about our prohibition: he wants to chew on the humidifier cord because 1) cords are delicious (duh!), but just as importantly because 2) we scream and race across the room every time he goes for it. But the problem here is that he's clearly picked up a general pattern here, one that defines the category of toy objects itself: the shiny, colorful, plasticky things are the things that mom and dad want me to play with, while all the black and beige things with cords are The Forbidden.
So here's my proposal: a line of toddler toys that are totally indistinguishable from Actual Consumer Electronics, save one key attribute: they are incapable of killing or maiming little children. Where appropriate, they sport fake electric cords, perhaps even with fake sockets you can suction-cup to the wall. There are no fluorescent dinosaurs on them, no Disney characters. Everything looks from a few feet away like it's right out of the Sharper Image catalog.
I think there's a quick million to be made here. Any takers?
Sadly, I think toddlers would be wise to this trivial deceit in nanoseconds flat. Not for nothing has it been observed that the only way to make a conscious two-year-old stop squirming is to place the child precisely equidistant between a vat of toxic chemicals and a revved-up chainsaw. Positioned correctly, the toddler will freeze on the spot, unable to decide which lethal danger to rush toward. Of course, the amount of energy bottled up by this procedure is prodigious, and the nation that first manages to harness it will rule the planet and go to the stars.
Posted by: Patrick Nielsen Hayden | April 20, 2004 at 01:23 AM
ROFLMAO....
'why buy toys when we have perfectly good pots and pans in the cupboard????'
my oldest(now almost 16) hide the tv remote control in his walkie firetruck when he was about 10 months old. I found it about 2 months later... in the firetruck... outside. roflmao.. His dad was NOT amused, however.. he actually had to get up off the couch to change channels. hahaha!
Steven... you need more sleep! You had best try to stock up on the zzzzzz's for when those 2 are teenagers..... you are going to need it! Don't call me then!
Posted by: Susan | April 20, 2004 at 01:28 AM
He'd lose interest because the mock electronics aren't forbidden fruit. If you want the same effect, just pretend to freak out and move him away from his own toys. They'll become the most precious things to him in the universe!
Posted by: Andy Baio | April 20, 2004 at 01:33 AM
We have the handset of a non-functional cordless phone in our toddler's pile o' toys. He doesn't pay any attention to it. He still goes for the phones that the grown-ups actually talk on.
(And then when we hand him the phone, and there's a real live person on the other end talking to him, he freezes. Kid, let me 'splain something: Grandma isn't going to be on this mortal plane forever, and the more you do to charm her now, the more you're likely to get from her estate....)
Posted by: Seth Gordon | April 20, 2004 at 03:05 AM
Counter-proposal: wouldn't it be fun if grown-ups had brightly-colored stuff to use?
And wouldn't it be cool to force your boss to use a bright-red cell-phone with a yellow headset (Hello Kitty decals optional), so maybe he wouldn't take himself so seriously? :)
Posted by: Bill Seitz | April 20, 2004 at 04:03 AM
Give it up - just admit they're smarter than you. Consider them samples of emerging intelligence.
Posted by: David Weisman | April 20, 2004 at 09:07 AM
Wouldn't fake sockets suction-cupped to the wall teach the child that it's okay to stick fingers and sundry other things into sockets? And if you plan to prevent the child from interfering with the fake socket for that reason then are you achieving anything at all? I suppose that you get the extra comfort that if you don't manage to prevent the child from playing with the fake socket there's only damage done to the child's learning rather than anything more... vital.
Posted by: Rory Parle | April 20, 2004 at 11:00 AM
My daughter's preschool had several old telephones that the kids LOVED playing with. They brought back nostalgia for us adults - remember DIALING a number? - and the kids loved them.
Of course they'd never actually seen telephones like that in general use. So I don't know whether it'd help your problem.
Many a babe has sucked the remote control to death...
Posted by: Jill | April 20, 2004 at 11:58 AM
Actually, the idea is good, but the toys have to be indistinguishable - so even daddy and mommy run towards them every time baby picks them up.
That way the toys retain the shock value, the Forbidden enigma, while at the same time providing hours of fun for when you tell the story to their first dates, many years later.
One thing, though: copyright. I can see Nokia pursuing me like a disney lawyer.
Posted by: Camilo | April 21, 2004 at 11:36 AM
I have a 14 month old daughter with a tendancy to play with the forbidden fruit. We have cured the problem inexpensively by simply giving her a remote of her own (batteries removed) and old mobile telephone(since these are an abundant feature in most homes)and by placing the fan (which in our house is a 18" unit) above the fridge, out of harms way, the cables are a difficult one, we have bulk bought power breakers for cables which are inavoidably exposed, therefore reducing the risk of any serious injury, even if she does manage to chew her way through a mains cable (and my daughter has 14 little nashers and she still hasn't succeeded). However, above all else, reverse pyschology is the rule: simply don't scream, run hysteriacally at the device when they approach it, just let them have a look and they will, just like the plastically toys purchased for them grow tired of them much sooner(although i fear you may be too late to do this now as kids unfortunately remember everything). Andy Baio comments are another good alternative. These methods have so far worked for me, but from what I understand the rules change when they reach 2 years, then all you need is the adoption clinic number!
Posted by: James McCarthy | April 22, 2004 at 05:49 AM
You know, we used to have a bunch of different old remote controls form stereos/TVs that had gone to the great trash heap in the sky. We'd give those to the kids to play with, but very quickly they'd learn that these *didn't actually work* and they then refused to play with them.
Posted by: Peter | April 22, 2004 at 08:10 AM
This reminds of the playing cards that came out for kids that had things like insurance man, able to file a claim in five seconds, or warehouse manager; able to track a package in the deepest darkest corners of the building with a single rfid chip... oh.. wait... nobody made those playing cards.... the fantasy wasn't to be like dad, or mom, just to use their stuff and create a whole new, different kind of life........ yeah, the kids wanted the real tools, but not their parents' lives...i think that was it... i dunno im a little rusty in my childhood fantasy production....
Posted by: kevin jones | April 22, 2004 at 11:05 AM
LMAO!! Quite the commentary. I have a 21 month old with the same CORD obsession. Fortunately, the Playskool Vacuum cleaner we purchased is a satisfactory replacement for the Eureka upright he's been entangling himself with and dragging around the house. Good Luck!
Posted by: tjlv | April 27, 2004 at 04:29 AM
With my boy (15 months old) we just tried giving him an unused PC keyboard, since he's so fascinated with mine, and manages to hit magic key combinations that kill my machine regularly. After the first 2 minutes of play on the first day, he's lost total interest in his keyboard. It's only interesting to him because I'm interested in it and it's off-limits. As soon as it's easily accessible, he doesn't even see it anymore. Maybe I should spend some time pretending his stuffed tiger is really dangerous and fun to play with. Nah, he'd probably see right through that.
Posted by: alan taylor | May 06, 2004 at 12:43 PM
Beyond Northern Iqaq page. Welcome.
Posted by: S. Hughes | May 10, 2004 at 05:53 AM
Why not to allow him to play with what he wants to? Just make sure it's not dangerous. I liked to play with nails and a hummer when I was 4...
Tina
Posted by: Tina | June 10, 2004 at 12:24 PM